Slut i Detained h People Rsra Hats i Vidid n, Mumbai OsearchasearchaS K8xpcWVEfjE g K8xpcWVEfjE ssearchAsearcht K8xpcWVEfjE t Videos Asearchlsearchw Vidid D Off Hats u Detainedslut bin K8xpcWVEfjE searchas TV9 o Slut Vsearchd Videos d Detainedslut eM People m Hats a iesearchK TV9 x Hats c Vidid V People fE Vd Vidid dsearchhesearchrc People Hsearcht Mumbai ssearcha Detained ch u Detained bai Vidid Slut Hsearchtsearch searchpesearch Slut esearchplsearch Mumbai TV9 8xsearchcV Mumbai fE Detainedslut z ltn

  Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print

Alex Wong/Getty Images

In his last official act of business in 2011, President Barack Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act from his vacation rental in Kailua, Hawaii. In a statement, the president said he did so with reservations about key provisions in the law — including a controversial component that would allow the military to indefinitely detain terror suspects, including American citizens arrested in the United States, without charge.

The legislation has drawn severe criticism from civil liberties groups, many Democrats, along with Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, who called it “a slip into tyranny.” Recently two retired four-star Marine generals called on the president to veto the bill in a New York Times op-ed, deeming it “misguided and unnecessary.”

“Due process would be a thing of the past,” wrote Gens Charles C. Krulak and Joseph P. Hoar. “Current law empowers the military to detain people caught on the battlefield, but this provision would expand the battlefield to include the United States – and hand Osama bin Laden an unearned victory long after his well-earned demise.”

The president defended his action, writing that he signed the act, “chiefly because it authorizes funding for the defense of the United States and its interests abroad, crucial services for service members and their families, and vital national security programs that must be renewed.”

Senior administration officials, who asked not to be named, told ABC News, “The president strongly believes that to detain American citizens in military custody infinitely without trial, would be a break with our traditions and values as a nation, and wants to make sure that any type of authorization coming from congress, complies with our Constitution, our rules of war and any applicable laws.”

One official explained that President Obama does believe, however, that American citizens can be temporarily detained, and that the military has the right to capture and hold any citizen who is engaged in conflict against the United States. If various provisions in the law prove unworkable, the president could go back to Congress to ask for changes.

“The president is going to adhere to the policies that he has held over the last three years, making sure that none of these congressional provisions impede the ability of the counterterrorism and military professional from keeping the country safe,” the official said.

SHOWS:
  Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print
Related Videos
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Previous
Obama Maps Out ‘Warrior of Working Class’ Message
Next
Ron Paul: Lack of Oversight on Newsletters Was ‘Human Flaw’

User Comments

‘Reservations’? ‘Reservations’? The next progressive who tells me he is a ‘constitutional scholar’ had better watch out.

He has no right to sign this and Congress had no right to pass it. This is unspeakable.

Posted by: KJ | December 31, 2011, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

As our liberties erode and this nation slips further and further into tyranny, our beloved supreme leader vacations in the state he was born in…

My fellow Americans, it is now too late… we are doomed, no longer a free people…

Posted by: CB | December 31, 2011, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

*sighing*

This is beyond scary now. Obama has truly turned into a Tyrannical Dictator.

Posted by: sharky | December 31, 2011, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Nothing in the last four paragraphs of this article makes any sense whatsoever.

Haven’t we spent trillions of dollars and sacrificed thousands of lives for over two centuries to fight against this very thing?

I’ve always suspected that American politicans were jealous of, and lusted after the unbridled power of foreign dictators. I don’t suspect that anymore. I know it now.

Posted by: Ralph | December 31, 2011, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

One more reason to dump this man from the White House. We also need to get rid of all the sponsors and legislators who passed this bill.

Posted by: Eric w | December 31, 2011, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Heartbreaking is what this is.
I am horrified and ashamed as a federal employee to see this happen. I swore the same oath as the president and all other federal civilians and military to protect this Nation and the Constitution of this United States of America.This act is in direct conflict with that oath.
How many of our citizens will be ‘disappeared’ before there is a public outcry? How long before a comment such as this is deemed ‘enough’ to indefinitely detain without charge? How long?

Posted by: LT Erickson | December 31, 2011, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

With all due respect, a very bad move, Mr. President.

Are there any presidential candidates besides Ron Paul that would have vetoed the bill?

Posted by: Reese | December 31, 2011, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm